Due to occasional DMCA takedowns on his Youtube channels, Jarrah's videos sometimes become unavailable.  The plan is to put a mostly-complete list of them here, for viewing and download.  This will take awhile and will be added to gradually.

For the meantime, here are some important videos.

MoonFaker series
Episode#   Title
1 MoonFaker: Exhibit A
2 MoonFaker: Exhibit B
3 MoonFaker: Exhibit B-1
4 MoonFaker: Carrying The Liar
5 MoonFaker: Spacewalks, Golf Games & Denials
6   MoonFaker: The Exhibit B Addendum
7 MoonFaker: Project Sandbox
8 MoonFaker: Lunar Lies
9 MoonFaker: Premature Separation
10 MoonFaker: UFA Unidentified Flying Apollo
11 MoonFaker: Cats & Elephants
13 MoonFaker: Propagandists, Liars, & Truth Hunters
15 MoonFaker: Leapin’ Lunatics
16 MoonFaker: The Penny Drops
18 MoonFaker: All Bets Are On
19 MoonFaker: Rocks & Crocks
25 MoonFaker: One Giant Leap
27 MoonFaker: A Puffy Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon
30 MoonFaker: Jay Windley vs Brian O'Leary
32 MoonFaker: Jay Windley vs Brian O'Leary Addendum
33 MoonFaker: Posing For Portrait
41 MoonFaker: Apollo 1
43 MoonFaker: LRO, SELENE & Clementine
53 MoonFaker: Something Outrageous & the C-130
57 MoonFaker: Spider's Web
78 MoonFaker: What Now
79 MoonFaker: Where's The Plume
80 MoonFaker: Where's The Plume II
81 MoonFaker: Hanging Sixteen
82 MoonFaker: LRO, Still No Halo
87 MoonFaker: No-Fly Zones, Buffer Zones & Their Effect on Private Space Exploration
88 MoonFaker: Exhibit B, Corrections & Revisions
89 MoonFaker: False Frame-rates
90 MoonFaker: LRO, More Dead Ends
91 MoonFaker: LRO, Flag or No Flag
92 MoonFaker: LRO, Flag or No Flag II
93 MoonFaker: Chinese Roadtrip
94 MoonFaker: Chang'e 3, Clementine & Apollo

The MoonFaker Series

"Originally this series was intended to be a long essay for download off Albino Gallupinni's website made in honour of Bill Kaysing. Back when I first started writing it, it was impossible for one to discuss the fake moon landings without someone posting a link to a spurious pro-NASA website written by some propagandist with axes to grind. The things these individuals write online is just plain wrong and can be proved wrong with little more than a basic understanding in science or by checking the source material that they misrepresented. Not only do these individuals misrepresent the facts, they resort to logical fallacies; especially taking their opponents out of context.

Phil Plait for example went as far as alleging that Bill Kaysing denied that any space travel was possible, despite the fact that Kaysing explicitly stated that the shuttle and surveyors were indeed possibilities and that Mercury and Gemini did indeed happen.

Finally having enough of their propaganda and character assassination, I took it upon myself to write up a long, long essay refuting all these pro-NASA websites point-by-point. However, because I like to be absolutely thorough, even when discussing a simple topic, by the time I had finished the essay was the size of a phone book. It also needed to be stripped of certain less than pleasant things I had to say about the propagandists. Back then I had very little tolerance and patience for these individuals, and to this day it’s difficult to comment on their obnoxious defamation and propaganda without getting pissed off.

So rather than release this jumbo-sized essay, I began adapting sections of it to video. Along the way I gained more information and evidence. The ongoing result is my MoonFaker series." – Jarrah White

The Gem Series

"The Gem Series started out as a response to the a standard argument used by many propagandists. In their attempts to prove the Apollo 11 telecasts were real, pro-NASA individuals bombarded their audiences with a brief clip from the Apollo 11 30:28GET (mission time) telecast. The clip they use shows the "earth" vanishing behind the CSM's window. Propagandists loved this clip because they claim it disproves the arguments of David Percy and Bart Sibrel. However, there is something that these propagandists always neglect to tell their viewers when showing this, and they made the fatal mistake by claiming this clip came from an unedited source. After the pro-NASA group repeatedly denied requests to upload the entire TV transmission, I took matters into my own hands by doing it for them. Even after the release of Apollo XI: The Little Gem, it took a good three months before just one of the pro-NASA individuals admitted that the 30:28telecast was an edited video.

Before I even started the MoonFaker series, propagandists had recommended to their audiences the "unedited and complete" Apollo flight footage sold by Spacecraft Films. Remembering that CAPCOM Charley Duke made note of the Apollo 11 TV quality, comparing them to that of Apollo 10, I decided to investigate on that and did so by ordering the Apollo 10 DVD set by Spacecraft Films. As I watched these videos I compared them with NASA's official transcript of the mission. It soon became apparent that the videos sold were neither complete or unedited.

Not only did the Apollo 10 views of earth turn out to be pre-filmed and edited together, but also portions of video footage were excluded in the "complete" Spacecraft Films DVD set. The propagandists best excuse for this was LOS (Loss Of Signal), however LOS cannot account for missing pieces of video that the official transcript confirms was recieved.

My findings were compiled together in a video called Flagging The Gems. Even though NASA still and video photography is public domain, three days after the release of my film Mark Gray of Spacecraft Films filed copyright infringement against it and got my YouTube account suspended. He also flagged Greenmagoo's video clip from Apollo 15, which shows the flag waving when David Scott ran past it. When I started my new YouTube account, it became clear that Spacecraft Films would police the use of Apollo footage and enforce copyright on those who used it to question the moon landings. In addition, The Telecast Propagandists Wish They Kept To Themselves and The Telecast Propagandists Pretend To Love were both removed from my new account. (All these videos are available on this page, and are protected under fair use.)

The videos, made from public domain NASA footage, which Mark Gray and the propagandists have tried to suppress, can be viewed here." – Jarrah White

Apollo Zero

"Shortly after my MoonFaker series was released, I was approached by the lads at They asked me if I would like to help them on a public domain moon hoax project. I said yes. The end result was Apollo Zero. It can be viewed online for free and is included as a free bonus disc with the purchase of the Comprehensive Package from" – Jarrah White.

Apollo Zero seeks to prove that no man has ever really walked on the moon.

Think about this: to date, only three countries have been able to put a man merely in Earth orbit - the United States, Russia, and China. That speaks to how difficult it is just to get into orbit. Next, consider how far away the moon is from the Earth: 240,000 miles. Since the alleged moon landings, no country even claims to have gone more than 400 miles from Earth and that was in the Space Shuttle. The International Space Station orbits at 200 miles above Earth. There is a big difference between 240,000 miles and 400 miles. Why can't anyone make it more than 400 miles from Earth today if we could make a 480,000 mile round trip in 1969?

NASA further asserts that three men were loaded into a rocket, flew 240,000 miles to the moon and then achieved lunar orbit. They say the spacecraft separated and two astronauts flew 60 miles to the surface of the moon, in a vacuum and 1/6 Earth gravity. They then hung out on the moon for up to three days in 250 degree heat, hit golf balls, rode a moon buggy — but what powered their life support and equipment? They say BATTERIES.

They then supposedly blasted off the surface of the moon, docked with the third man going around the moon at over 4000 miles per hour, and made it 240,000 miles back to Earth. They re-entered Earth's atmosphere going 25,000 mph, but parachutes assured a safe landing in the ocean.

We hope you will agree that Apollo Zero proves the absurdity of NASA's claim in a clear and convincing fashion. View Apollo Zero and decide for yourself. To download Apollo Zero, we suggest using

Apollo Zero was produced solely for educational, non-profit use.